Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457839 --- Comment #1 from Bryan Kearney <bkearney@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-12 17:07:05 EDT --- * General OK - Package name But why a gem? XX - License info is accurate Specify LGPL based on COPYING File OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name XX - Specfile is legible Explicitly list the test files, and their permissions. No Loops. OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories XX - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OUTPUT of "rpmbuild --rebuild rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm " Installing rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: user mcpierce does not exist - using root warning: group mcpierce does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412 + umask 022 + cd /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/BUILD /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412: line 23: cd: /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/BUILD: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30412 (%prep) OUTPUT of "rpmbuild -bb rubygem-cobbler.spec" Processing files: rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/COPYING warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/NEWS warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/README warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml Provides: config(rubygem-cobbler) = 0.0.1-1.fc9 rubygem(cobbler) = 0.0.1 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires: /usr/bin/ruby config(rubygem-cobbler) = 0.0.1-1.fc9 rubygems Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9-root-bkearney Wrote: /home/bkearney/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53996 OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent XX - rpmlint is silent rpmlint rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm rubygem-cobbler.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 8) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rubygem-cobbler.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml rubygem-cobbler.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cobbler-0.0.1/config/cobbler.yml 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. * Package a rubygem OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname} OK - Source points to full URL of gem OK - Package version identical with gem version OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly OK - %prep and %build are empty XX - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it [bkearney@localhost noarch]$ sudo rpm --install rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm package rubygem-cobbler-0.0.1-1.fc9.noarch is already installed [bkearney@localhost noarch]$ irb irb(main):001:0> require "cobbler" LoadError: no such file to load -- cobbler from (irb):1:in `require' from (irb):1 OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir ** noarch rubygem OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir} OK - Package is noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review