[Bug 454687] Review Request: perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl extension for the clamav virus scanner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454687


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl     |perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl
                   |extension for the clamav    |extension for the clamav
                   |virus scanner               |virus scanner




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-10 16:18:51 EDT ---
This is standard Perl module, but a couple of things bother me.

If you visit the upstream URL, you can't see version 0.22, just 0.13.  If you
search for ClamAV on CPAN you'll see a link to 0.22, but clicking there gets
you a page with a big red "UNAUTHORIZED" warning.  What's that about?

When running the tests, I see the following:
        (in cleanup) panic: free from wrong pool.
which is kind of troubling.

I see no problems with the packaging, but I'm reluctant to approve this without
some discussion of those two issues.

* source files match upstream:
   1927671296cd398a1b0ce3102683ed23e78648fc9dd643a8fab92d18e33b010b  
   Mail-ClamAV-0.22.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   ClamAV.so()(64bit)
   perl(Mail::ClamAV) = 0.22
   perl(Mail::ClamAV::Status)
   perl-Mail-ClamAV = 0.22-1.fc10
   perl-Mail-ClamAV(x86-64) = 0.22-1.fc10
  =
   libclamav.so.4()(64bit)
   libclamav.so.4(CLAMAV_PUBLIC)(64bit)
   perl >= 0:5.006001
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(Class::Struct)
   perl(Exporter)
   perl(IO::Handle)
   perl(Inline)
   perl(Inline) >= 0.44
   perl(strict)
   perl(warnings)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=10,  2 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr  0.00 sys +  1.58 cusr  0.12 
    csys =  1.71 CPU)
  (discounting the weird panic at the end)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]