Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455654 Peter Vrabec <pvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Peter Vrabec <pvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-08 12:36:47 EDT --- $ rpmlint pads-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm pads.src: W: strange-permission pads.init 0755 pads.src: W: strange-permission pads.sysconfig 0640 - pads.init and pads.sysconfig might be 0644 $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pads-1.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm pads.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/pads 0640 pads.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pads-ether-codes pads.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pads-signature-list pads.i386: E: non-readable /etc/pads.conf 0640 pads.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pads $prog pads.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/pads $prog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. - is there a reason why not 0644 for /etc/sysconfig/pads and /etc/pads.conf - incoherent-subsys? it doesn't seem to me. prog=pads - non-conffile-in-etc - seems ok to me Everything else is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review