Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-07 14:53:59 EDT --- > We can get the review rolling with a pre-review, even before you organize the fedoraproject account. I have an account, but the CLA may need to go through my company's legal dept... otherwise so far I haven't done anything but create it. > And you should be referring to the process in: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > so please post the .spec and .src.rpm somewhere on the web, and explicitly provide the links in this bug, The .spec is already here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729 I don't have anywhere to put the SRPM (and/or haven't figured out / set up FAS), but it's easily created: cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES ; wget http://www.opengtl.org/download/OpenGTL-0.9.4.tar.bz2 cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; wget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729 cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; rpmbuild -bs OpenGTL.spec (in appropriate directories, of course) Or, is 163k small enough to just dump the SRPM in here as an attachment, also? > in the requested format, ie with description, and rpmlint status. D'oh! Sorry about that! Trying again... ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ echo * OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-devel-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-libs-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint * OpenGTL-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not sure if the no-documentation warning is interesting? Should I just copy the same doc to -devel, -libs? Or is there a "normal" way to handle this I'm not familiar with? Other than the above warnings, I've tried to follow the specs as close as possible (and as far as I can tell, I'm ok w.r.t. the ReviewGuidelines checklist), but as you know this is still my first package, so I'm still feeling my way around :-). Note: I can't conveniently test with mock right now as I'm on x86_64 (see blocking bug 455502). I'm building locally with a fixed llvm package from Cyrille Berger. When I get time, I'll test it on my other (i686) machine that should build with the current rawhide llvm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review