Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-08-06 11:39:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I plan on up/packaging upstreams other *_ntsc libs. The author mentions the > latest release include a source cleanup and refactoring, so that some files are > now identical between the 3x *_ntsc sources. Would it be acceptable/worth the > effort to create a single libntsc package, that includes all three upstream > source packages, with sub packages for -nes, -snes, -sms ? IMHO it is not worth the trouble and you could have a serious drawback. What if upstream update just -sms? You should make a new release for all three - and this is something unneeded by both end users (who would download a release for -nes and -snes for nothing) and for infrastructure (who would build a release for -nes and -snes for nothing). Separate packages is the way to go if upstream have separate independent sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review