[Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213





------- Additional Comments From jeffperry_fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-30 18:08 EST -------
** UNOFFICIAL REVIEW - NEED SPONSOR ***

INCOMPLETE BUT OK - rpmlint output not included for spec file 
     My run shows it to be ok though:
         0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings
NEEDSWORK- rpmlint output not included for SRPM
     My run shows it to produce one warning.
        html2text.src: W: invalid-license GPL
     Review the short hand codes for licenses and choose the correct GPL
     version. 
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
     In the case of html2text this field looks like it should say: GPL+ 
OK - The package must be named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines 
OK - The .spec file name matches the base package %{name}, format: %{name}.spec
OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets
      the  Licensing Guidelines 
OK - legal appears to be ok - GPL code according to README file. 
OK - The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license
     After the above rpmlint issue is cleared this will be OK
OK - Source package includes license text in README, README is listed as doc 
     file.
OK - The spec file must be written in American English
OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
      md5sum is: 6097fe07b948e142315749e6620c9cfc
NEEDSWORK - The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
      I was unable to get this to build. 
         1) Fetched spec file to rpmbuild/SPEC,
         2) placed SRPM in rpmbuild/SRPM
         3) extracted tar.gz source from SRPM and placed into rpmbuild/SOURCES
         3) cd to rpmbuild/SPEC
         4) rpmbuild -ba html2text.spec 
 
        error: File .../rpmbuild/SOURCES/sgml.C.patch: No such file or directory

    This is probably a simple fix - I will leave this one as an exercise for
    the submitter.

This is enough comment for now...possibly more to come.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]