Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 ------- Additional Comments From bretm@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-29 17:38 EST ------- 1) We could ship a wp-config.php that is suitably commented and forces the user to edit the value, but having that file not exist achieves the same goal in a fashion more in-line w/ upstream and the currently shipped wordpress package, and wp-config-sample.php is shipped as the example to customize off of. You're right though, the rpm -e case needs to be addressed, I'll look into that. 2) Generally speaking, I'm open to ideas about how best to handle post rpm-bit-deployment configuration. For multi-system applications, we've typically just not worried too much about configs, trusting that a cfengine or puppet system would deploy what was necessary after the fact... I'm all ears for a better solution. 3) I am not at all a fan of the existing wordpress-mu installer, and plan long-term to work with upstream to have a better deployment & configuration story. This ties into #2. 4) any patches for the selinux use case cheerfully accepted :) That's just one area of the installer that will make selinux quite unhappy... if you enable file uploads, I'm pretty sure selinux will prevent that without custom policy, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review