Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-builder - Builders for MarkUp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457034 ------- Additional Comments From sahartsu@xxxxxxxxx 2008-07-29 16:33 EST ------- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: GPLv2,Ruby Actual License: GPLv2+,Ruby %doc License: n/a Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok Compile and Build: - F-7: builds - F-8: builds - rawhide: builds - EL-5: builds Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: not applicable Shared libs: not applicable Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: ok %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: not applicable Static Libraries in -static package: not applicable pkgconfig Requires: not applicable Library files: not applicable Devel requires base package: not applicable .la libtool archives: not applicable Duplicate ownership of files/directories: no Remove BuildRoot: yes UTF-8 filenames: no package approved Can someone change the review tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review