[Bug 238379] Package review: emesene

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Package review: emesene
Alias: emesene

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379





------- Additional Comments From cchance@xxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-28 01:41 EST -------
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines:

- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on  Package Naming Guidelines . 

<< Please rename emesene_old.spec to emesene.spec.

<< Remove "remove the dummy .pyc .pyo, useless but weighty" line of comment from
spec file and file a bug to include actual commands to perform such action. Or
include that now.

<< Uncomment and change 2 %doc lines to be without "emesene/" prefix to have
documentation packaged properly.

Other than this I didn't see anything wrong at the moment.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]