Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-28 01:41 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . << Please rename emesene_old.spec to emesene.spec. << Remove "remove the dummy .pyc .pyo, useless but weighty" line of comment from spec file and file a bug to include actual commands to perform such action. Or include that now. << Uncomment and change 2 %doc lines to be without "emesene/" prefix to have documentation packaged properly. Other than this I didn't see anything wrong at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review