Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbindiff - Visual binary diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454482 ------- Additional Comments From nicoleau.fabien@xxxxxxxxx 2008-07-27 17:36 EST ------- Update for 3.0 beta 4 version : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/vbindiff.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/vbindiff-3.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.src.rpm COPYING file is now included in the package (added by upstream). Source files in "curses", equivalent under win32 and table.h now contains a licence statement (added by upstream). For putty.src file, here is upstream note : As explained in the ncurses dist, there's no clear copyright on the terminfo file. I did add a note to README that putty.src is not part of VBinDiff and should be considered under the ncurses terms. Rebuild under mock still ok. rpmint output : [builder@FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint vbindiff-3.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.i386.rpm vbindiff-3.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.src.rpm vbindiff-debuginfo-3.0-0.1.beta4.fc9.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder@FEDOBOX tmp]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review