Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enlightenment - a next generation desktop shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt@xxxxxxxxx 2008-07-26 12:18 EST ------- * Sat Jul 26 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk <stlwrt@xxxxxxxxx> - 0.16.999.043-2 - Added missing efreet-devel require to enlightenment-devel - Removed broken enlightenment_sys - Removed more improperly placed docs - Fixed directory ownership Spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e-for-rawhide/2/enlightenment.spec SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e-for-rawhide/2/ enlightenment-0.16.999.043-2.fc10.src.rpm RPMs for rawhide-x86_64: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e-for-rawhide/2/ >Would you explain what .edj files are? Can this be freely (re)distributable? .edj are enlightened skins, which consist of images and some bytecode. They're generated from stuff in source tarball which has same license as C code >efeet-devel is also needed for Requires of -devel subpackage (see e.h) fixed >pkgconfig file is like this upstream and it somehow works when building additional modules, will report to developers >"config.h" inclusion no idea, will also be reported >%prep - Perhaps the following is simpler thanks, replaced my lame code with yours proper >Duplicate files fixed >Directory ownership issue fixed >Please explain why two binaries must have setuid bits. cpufreq module changes governors directly, not depending on bulky power management daemons like gnome/kde removed enlightenment_sys bits which don't seem to work (deprecated?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review