Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calamaris - Squid native log format (NLF) analyzer and report generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456583 redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-25 14:57 EST ------- Regarding "cvsextras: no": I think, our talk in IRC explains it, it's just the old thing regarding changes which are done to help/improve but cause damages on the package, because the changing person hasn't enough knowledge about the pkg or didn't check all points for a version change which maybe introduces new bugs or even regressions caused by upstream. And as of the moment, I'm able to walk through all of my (30?) packages, I've usually open less than 5 open bug reports assigned to me which are handled in most cases < 24 hrs - even if I'm abroad. On the other hand, there are co-maintainers as well, but I still think, that I am maintaining also many packages just for myself such as php-idn, beecrypt, perl-Net-LibIDN, digitemp, libopm, perl-ccom, tcpick, bind-libbind and others. Note, that even some of my packages have "cvsextras: yes" and I'll re-think it and maybe change it for one or another non-critical, but more active package via the pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review