[Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010





------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2008-07-23 00:04 EST -------
ok, I went through my review checklist here and found just one issue...

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
See below - License
See below - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
9d42b1516dc487e57e1d6a1c25fd8820  xvarstar-0.9.tar.gz
9d42b1516dc487e57e1d6a1c25fd8820  xvarstar-0.9.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. The License here seems to me to be "GPLv2+"
Note that the source files all have the
"either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version."
Do you see any place where this is not the case?

Michael: Can you update that? Or explain why it's not the case? 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]