[Bug 455069] Review Request: Xpad - Sticky notepad for GTK+2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Xpad - Sticky notepad for GTK+2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455069


thomas.moschny@xxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |thomas.moschny@xxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny@xxxxxx  2008-07-18 14:20 EST -------
[x] = ok, [!] = not ok, [-] = not applicable

[x] package meets naming guidelines
[x] specfile is encoded in ascii or utf-8
[x] specfile matches base package name
[x] specfile uses macros consistently
[x] specfile is written cleanly
[x] specfile is written in AE
[x] changelog is present and has correct format
[x] license matches actual license
[x] license is open source-compatible
[x] license text is included in package
[x] source tag has correct url
[x] source files match upstream
    md5sum: 1e12e6aec8f03a656eb6427ba22c38d3
[x] latest version is packaged
[x] summary is concise
[x] dist tag is present
[x] buildroot is correct
[x] buildroot is prepped
[x] %clean is present
[!] proper build requirements
    libICE-devel is already required by libSM-devel
[!] proper requirements
    require hicolor-icon-theme (owns /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps)
[x] uses %{?_smp_mflags}
[x] uses %{optflags}
[x] doesn't use %makeinstall
[x] package builds at least on one architecture
    tested on: f9/x86_64
[x] packages installs and runs at least on one architecture
    tested on: f9/x86_64
[x] rpmlint is quiet
[x] final provides/requires look sane
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
[x] code, not content
[x] file permissions are appropriate
[x] debuginfo package looks usable
[-] config files marked as %config(noreplace)
[!] owns all the directories it creates
    see above
[-] static libraries in -devel subpackage
[-] header files in -devel subpackage
[-] development .so files in -devel subpackage
[-] pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage, requires pkgconfig
[x] no .la files
[x] doesn't need a -docs subpackage
[!] relevant docs are included
    please add NEWS, THANKS and TODO
[x] doc files are not needed at runtime
[x] provides a .desktop file, build-requires desktop-file-utils
[x] uses %find_lang, build-requires gettext

minor issue:
replace "%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.*" with "%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1*"


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]