Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pydotconf - python parser for dot.conf file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454921 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant@xxxxxxxxx 2008-07-18 04:57 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, Thanks for the review. Package Updated. SPEC URL : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/python-dotconf/rpm/python-dotconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/python-dotconf/rpm/python-dotconf-0.2-5.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #7) > BTW > > * Your latest package does not build on dist-f9-updates-candidate: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=722566 > egg info is created on F-9/devel (I forgot for F-8) It just did not strike me to scratch build on koji myself. dist-f9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723978 dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723983 dist-f8 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723982 dist-olpc3 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=723985 > * Currently all branches are >= F-8 and %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 is of no sense > (unless you are thinking of OLPC branch) Yes I will be requesting an OLPC branch. However I have fixed it as follows %if 1%{?olpc} BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel %else BuildRequires: python-setuptools %endif > * Currently no issue (as they are same), however would you clarify > this package is GPLv3 or GPLv3+? Thanks for checking this up. The license should have been GPLv3+. I have fixed this now, however it will not be reflected in the SRPM built on koji scratch build. I have made the requisite fix in the SPEC that that I have uploaded. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review