Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-ExecFlow - High level API for event-based execution flow control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452523 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-17 11:29 EST ------- Well, each source file applies a license of it's own, with inlined licenses overruling detached licenses. I.e. as all *.pm's carry an explicit license, the global README is mostly void. => This package contains both "GPL+ or Artistic" files and "LGPL'ed" files. Now the big (and controversal) question is: a) Are perl-modules linked or b) are they simply calling each other? If a) applies, the only way to ship this package is to relicense it as "GPL+"-only (LGPL'ed code can be changed to GPL) If b) applies, this discussion is moot. I think b) applies, but IANAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review