Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 ------- Additional Comments From dkaylor@xxxxxxxxx 2008-07-16 21:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > For 0.1.6-2: > > * Dependency > - Okay, it seems to work now (perhaps rawhide mono was just broken...) > However currently I get the message like below: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1@localhost tasque]$ tasque > > ** (Tasque:16280): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from > /usr/lib/tasque/Tasque.exe could not be loaded: > Assembly: NDesk.DBus.GLib (assemblyref_index=8) > Version: 1.0.0.0 > Public Key: f6716e4f9b2ed099 > The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the > MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly > (/usr/lib/tasque/). > > > ** (Tasque:16280): WARNING **: Could not load file or assembly 'NDesk.DBus.GLib, > Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=f6716e4f9b2ed099' or one of its > dependencies. > > ** (Tasque:16280): WARNING **: Missing method Init in assembly > /usr/lib/tasque/Tasque.exe, type NDesk.DBus.BusG > [Debug]: Tasque remote control disabled (DBus exception): Could not load file or > assembly 'NDesk.DBus.GLib, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, > PublicKeyToken=f6716e4f9b2ed099' or one of its dependencies. > [Debug]: Found Available Backend: Tasque.Backends.RtmBackend.RtmBackend > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Perhaps adding "Requires: ndesk-dbus-glib" is preferable. > > - Also, for directory ownership issue (%{_datadir}/dbus-1/services/), > it may be preferable that you write the explicit dependency: "Requires: dbus". > > * Desktop files > - Please remove the category "X-SuSE-Core-Office" from the desktop file > (as we are not on SuSE). > > Then: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. > > Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other > submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. > For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) > are required to "show that you have an understanding > of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described > on : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > > Usually there are two ways to show this. > A. submit other review requests with enough quality. > B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request > (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do > a formal review) > > When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other > person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report > so that I can check your comments or review request. > > Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to > review can be checked on: > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html > (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") > > > Review guidelines are described mainly on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Latest revision: http://kaylor.info/fedora/SPEC/tasque.spec http://kaylor.info/fedora/SRPM/tasque-0.1.6-3.fc9.src.rpm ndesk-dbus-glib is definitely preferable. I tried installing revision 2 on a clean Fedora 9 live usb and the program started but would later crash. The SuSE reference is now removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review