Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 ------- Additional Comments From dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-15 19:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=311894) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311894&action=view) diff between last .spec and this updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-3.fc9.src.rpm - del preun symbolic link removes - already done by files section - add Requires hicolor-icon-theme, so that icon dir is owned correctly - fix license tag to GPLv2+ since sources say: or later version - fix some comments spelling $ rpmlint SRPMS/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint --info RPMS/noarch/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-3.fc9.noarch.rpm pyvnc2swf.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/vnc2swf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/vnc2swf.py Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. pyvnc2swf.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/vnc2swf-edit /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/edit.py Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Michel: I did a bit of a search on absolute symlinks, and tried to make such using symlinks -cs: http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/25 , but that didn't resolve the rpm warning. Do you know if this is considered normal to ignore, or can you point to a way to resolve it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review