Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-13 17:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > FAIL - MUST: The License field in the package spec file does not match the > actual license: Code is GPLv3+, but License tag is GPLv2+ > FAIL - MUST: License text from source is included in %doc, but the License is > out of date (GPLv2) Changed to GPLv3+ in the spec file, sent e-mail to upstream to correct that for the next upstream release. > FAIL - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but > gtkglextmm-devel is only needed when building with --enable-opengl. The OpenGL > interface looks really cool and works here and so I suggest to include it. > What do you think? I agree with you, enabled now. Thought, that would be catched up automagically once the dependency is satified, but it looks not as it would be the case. > FIX - SHOULD: Please bug upstream to include an updated copy of the license > text. Done, see above and within your mailbox. > FIX? - SHOULD: Could you include a German translation of description and > summary? No not really, this is something for specspo package. > FIX - SHOULD: Typo in description: less -> least, consist -> consists. > IMHO the description could be simplified a little: I've taken your rewrite now, sounds better. Former description was taken from the Beldi website. > NEEDSWORK Done, SRPM: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/beldi-0.9.16-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review