Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny@xxxxxx 2008-07-08 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > That' very strange, they use an autotools configure script but the Makefile.in > isn't automake compliant. I think it is perfectly alright to use autoconf but not automake. > Is there any reasons not to move to an plain Makefile.am file (using automake > and probably libtool also)? That'd be an upstream decision, and it would probably alleviate building the shared lib for us. But honestly, my sharedlib patch isn't that complicated, and as far as I see, it's working. So I'm not going to waste my time struggling with autotools, unless I can clearly see what gain that could have. We don't care whether it's portable or something, as long as it works on Fedora. Other way round, do you see anything not working properly the way it is now? > Do you know if there is problem while realtime is enabled and if it will lead > to ABI changes ? Can you rephrase, please? I don't understand that question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review