Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mingw-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 ------- Additional Comments From berrange@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-08 14:03 EST ------- After further discussion on fedora-devel it seems we have no choice but to maintain a custom forked RPM, since upstream binutils for MinGW doesn't supply clean patches for binutils releases :-( I would suggest that we use the name 'binutils-mingw' instead of 'mingw-binutils' as the RPM name though, since other mingw packages will likely be done as sub-RPMs with a -mingw postfix to their name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review