Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mingw-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 berrange@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From berrange@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-08 09:44 EST ------- Not so fast with approving this. IMHO, having separate mingw SPEC files is totally unsustainable for maintainence. We need to build from the existing binutils SPEC file, perhaps just adding a sub-RPM with the mingw build of it (cf kernel SPEC which builds many sub-RPMs with different variants, PAE, SMP, UP, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review