[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017





------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-07 04:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)

> I am not sure it is a good idea to rename the package from the upstream name.

We have the case here of an upstream naming that's very close to our own
conventions, so it's not so clear cut. But in other cases we don't hesitate to
rename, so I don't see why not there.

IMHO (and Debian has gone this way too lately) we'll need someday to review all
our font package names to be more strict and consistent. Consistency pays big
time with users and upstream namings are sadly not consistent at all.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]