Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-06 10:25 EST ------- Tim, are you still interested in this bug? 'Cause if you do, there are a couple of fixes needed. Most important one being the fact that - you claim the package is noarch but - in %files you use %{_libdir}/shezhu which leads to the following error: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/shezhu-1.20-1.fc10-OFXMjR error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/shezhu/Makefile /usr/lib/shezhu/README.loc /usr/lib/shezhu/access.loc /usr/lib/shezhu/action.js [...] (very long list of unpackaged stuff here) On a different line, I am not sure how important is this fragment from the end of the build process: TXT="MIDI" BOX=48x14 STR=23x8 ASC=8 DES=0 LFT=12 TOP=3 OUT=base-images/MIDI.gif TXT="MINI" BOX=48x14 STR=23x8 ASC=8 DES=0 LFT=12 TOP=3 OUT=base-images/MINI.gif TXT="LCDP" BOX=48x14 STR=29x8 ASC=8 DES=0 LFT=9 TOP=3 OUT=base-images/LCDP.gif Error: string width bigger than bounding box, 84 > -3 (I usually tend to avoid "error"s) In terms of the spec file - you should also use add "-q" to setup, in order to silence it - remove one of the two occurences of "perl" in the BR line. - what's the significance of the following lines under %description: Generic (Build 2008.02.01.12.24) Supports dates from 01/02/2008 to 31/01/2009 and expires on 01/02/2009 - last but not least, the web page of the project claims that Image::Magick would be needed, but the spec does not require / use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review