[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-06 08:15 EST -------
Thank you for initial comments:

For 1:
I did not know the wiki package, however as far as I check the wiki pacakage
it seems fine.

For 2:
Perhaps I've read them

For 3:
3-1: Some fedora contributor says that unless umask is set correctly fc-cache
creates
     font cache in a wrong permission: ref:
     http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00151.html
     For example, fonts-japanese package has umask scriptlet.
     I don't know if this issue has been correctly fixed. If you are sure this
     is not needed now please let me know it.
3-2: %defattr(0644,-,-,0755) = %defattr(-,root,root,-) and actually I don't think
     fonts packages must write a explicit umask values which differs from gerenal
     packaging guidelines. Are there any rationale?
5-AB: Will fix
5-C: Very intentional. Actually I don't want to have this rpm _automatically_ find
     the version.
     i.e. If the dependent fonts make update version, then this srpm won't build and
          someone (or Matt using automated massbuild) complains to me 
          "your srpm won't build, please fix it", which is actually what I am
intended.
6. Calling mkfontdir on scriptlet pulls X dependent packages, which is _banned_
   on current Fedora packaging: related to
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS
   Actually one day (before the release of F-8) all packages including core
fonts are
   made to not call mkfontdir or chkfontpath on scriptlet.
   
     

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]