[Bug 454125] Review Request: gtest - Google C++ testing framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtest - Google C++ testing framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454125


rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx  2008-07-05 15:18 EST -------
I am not sponsored yet. This is an unofficial review

rpmlint produces no output.

Required:
[x] package and spec file named against package naming guidelines
[x] license tag matches with actual license used. Source and package both have 
identical license copies. Included in %doc
[x] spec file has permissible content, is legible and written in American 
English
[x] md5sum for source (at project page) and source inside srpm meet - 
md5sum 669530b4399d8e02c1c96483bd939f6c
[x] successfully build and compiled on different platforms (used koji to build 
on ppc, ppc64, i386, x86_64)
[x] Build dependency - chrpath listed in BuildRoot
[-] Handle locales -- N/A
[-] relocatable -- N/A
[x] owns all directories created
[x] permissions okay
[x] %clean section present
[x] macros used consistently 
[x] Header files in -devel package
[x] static libraries --disabled
[x] base devel package requirement
     fully versioned dependency
     Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Checked
[x] *.la libtool archives removed
[x] No GUI --  %{name}.desktop  not required
[x] at beginning of %install and %clean removes buildroot -- Checked
[x] All files are utf-8 
[x] -devel subpackage only has symlinks so ldconfig not required in subpackage
[x] package meets package guideline
                                          

Optional:
[x] Includes license -- no need to query upstream
[x] description and summary translations -- not available
[x] No file dependency outside /etc, /bin/sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin

Key - = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated

Package looks Okay to me

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]