[Bug 452911] Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: trustyrc - IRC robot fully modular


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452911


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-02 18:16 EST -------
I note you didn't update the summary.  I'm not going to block this package because of language issues, but I would really suggest using something like the following, which I have written using your original text and applying as few changes as I could in order to make the result parse in English:

Summary: Fully modular IRC robot
%description
trustyRC is a fully modular IRC robot which includes all of the common bot features (channel moderation, administration, account system, quotes) and much more.  trustyRC is comprised of a a kernel and a plugin loader which loads features such as a log system, configuration parser, networking, etc.  All plugins can communicate with others, providing a highly flexible system.

A plugin can be loaded or unloaded while the bot is running, so if a plugin needs to be updated, it can be unloaded, rebuilt and reloaded.  During this, the bot does not need to be stopped.  Plugins are stored in shared libraries; a plugin's features are available to the bot when the plugin is loaded and those features are removed when the plugin is unloaded.



* source files match upstream:
   3a499e5a9303f77e5e6b5fdb93abaefe8d4a906476d0e1eabb1a1241a644b502  
   trustyrc-0.1.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
? summary is difficult to understand in English.
? description is very difficult to parse in English.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  trustyrc-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   config(trustyrc) = 0.1.1-2.fc10
   trustyrc = 0.1.1-2.fc10
  =
   config(trustyrc) = 0.1.1-2.fc10
   libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit)
   libtinyxml.so.0()(64bit)
   trustyrc-plugins

  trustyrc-plugins-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   admin.so()(64bit)
   ctcp.so()(64bit)
   ignore.so()(64bit)
   infos.so()(64bit)
   moderation.so()(64bit)
   module.so()(64bit)
   ping.so()(64bit)
   postconnect.so()(64bit)
   usersinfos.so()(64bit)
   trustyrc-plugins = 0.1.1-2.fc10
  =
   libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
   trustyrc = 0.1.1

  trustyrc-plugins-extras-0.1.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
   advertising.so()(64bit)
   bashfr.so()(64bit)
   bzrh.so()(64bit)
   fedorafr.so()(64bit)
   fedoraproject.so()(64bit)
   gameserver.so()(64bit)
   ipconverting.so()(64bit)
   lamoule.so()(64bit)
   magic8ball.so()(64bit)
   pluginsample.so()(64bit)
   quotes.so()(64bit)
   slapme.so()(64bit)
   survey.so()(64bit)
   tele.so()(64bit)
   trad.so()(64bit)
   trustyrc-plugins-extras = 0.1.1-2.fc10
  =
   libcurl.so.4()(64bit)
   libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
   libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
   trustyrc = 0.1.1

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  I've no idea how to test this 
   package.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]