Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 ------- Additional Comments From pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-07-02 10:32 EST ------- New version: 1.5.1-0.1.rc1 Spec file at: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec SRPM at: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-0.1.rc1.fc8.src.rpm _ Full URL in Source:. _ No more vendor:. _ No openssl version requirement. _ No openssl install-time requirement. _ RPM_BUILD_ROOT tests for cleaning removed. _ Directory %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd now owned by the package. _ %{_initrddir} used where possible. _ %defattr completed. _ init.d script reworked in a more fedora-styled way. But: * Yes, %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd/ocspd.conf is listed twice, as well as %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd/private. I did not find another "clean" way to do it, sinces these two items need specialized attributes/ownership. Even using a file list, I do not see a better "readable" way to own %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd and package theses two special subitems without listing them twice. This version "mock"ed successfully on fedora-devel-i386 rpmlint says: $ rpmlint SPECS/ocspd.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/ocspd-1.5.1-0.1.rc1.fc8.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ocspd-debuginfo-1.5.1-0.1.rc1.fc8.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ocspd-1.5.1-0.1.rc1.fc8.i386.rpm ocspd.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/ocspd/private ocspd ocspd.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/ocspd/private 0700 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Explanation: /etc/ocspd/private is a directory intended to contain private cryptographic keys, that should be readable only by the user running the daemon (user ocspd created in the %pre section). Any other "more standard" solution ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review