Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 pertusus@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-06-30 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Here's the package, same as the old one except that I redid the > version/release numbering as noted above. Also, I shortened the > "ChangeLog" considerably; I doubt anyone wants great detail about what > happened before it entered the repository. I prefer to have the full changelog, it also documents what was taken care of during the review. I won't make it a blocker, though. > I reset the release number to 1; > this release number format is completely different (and incompatible) > from the previous ones anyway, so we may as well start fresh at 1. Agreed. > SRPM and .spec file at: > http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.1.fc9.src.rpm > http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz.spec > > rpmlint is clean on .spec, binary i386 RPM, _and_ SRPM. > "koji build --scratch dist-f9" is clean on all 5 architectures. > > Did I misunderstand anything? Or see anything else that needs doing? I have sponsored you. Just proceed with the cvs request. I already have approved the package by setting fedora-review to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review