Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 ------- Additional Comments From auralvance@xxxxxxxxx 2008-06-30 14:12 EST ------- To clarify on the x86_64 debug comment in the spec file: /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit is called during the debug creation process and it fails to read the x86_64 binaries. extracting debug info from /var/tmp/songbird-0.6.1-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/xulrunner-bin Failed to write file: invalid section entry size This is not an issue in i386. I verified that the packages still work as intended, but the debug info is somehow maligned. This issue is definitely upstream, so I will be posting a bug when I have one. For more info I found the same issue in bug 187243 As for rpmlint, there are some issues, but all are upstream: $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/songbird-0.6.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/README.txt songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/icons/mozicon16.xpm songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/searchplugins/google-lyrics.xml songbird.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/songbird-0.6.1/README.txt songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/icons/mozicon50.xpm songbird.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/.autoreg songbird.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/.autoreg songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/components/nsContentPrefService.js songbird.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/songbird-0.6.1/TRADEMARK.txt songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/components/sbAddonMetadata.js songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/components/nsHandlerService.js songbird.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/LICENSE songbird.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/components/sbMetadataHandlerTaglib.so ['$ORIGIN/../xulrunner'] songbird.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/lib/sbGStreamer.so songbird.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/mangle ['$ORIGIN/../lib'] songbird.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/songbird-0.6.1/xulrunner/shlibsign ['$ORIGIN/../lib'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 4 warnings. The only one I was really concerned with is the RPATH error, but this seems to be completely internal in order to direct songbird to its own xulrunner libs. If it were to ask LD for information I'm guessing songbird would receive local xulrunner libs which are not patched by upstream. Feedback is appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review