Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zfuzz - Z fuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-06-27 13:14 EST ------- * it is not needed to put the name in the summary, I mean you can remove 'Z fuzz -' from the Summary. * Regarding the patch file names, I have a recommendation you can ignore, I use name like zfuzz-20070911-read-decl.patch to know in which version the patch was added. * regarding the version, if the versioning scheme was changed and the version became less recent that the latest date (the ordering is the ascii ordering), then you'll have to use an epoch. Not the end of the world but prone to easy errors when forgetting to specify the epoch in a version-release string. * regarding the name, having tex-zfuzz as a name really means that the name of the upstream software is zfuzz, but that it is a tex package. The fact that it is a tex package does not means that it is in a tex distribution (besides, I am quite sure that it could easily be incorporated in tex distributions). Users who knows that teh zfuzz package name is zfuzz and that it is a tex package should in fact expect that it is called tex-zfuzz. So naming it tex-zfuzz doesn't means that upstream choice is not honoured, but that honouring upstream choice in the fedora context means adding tex- in front. That being said, adding tex- in front of tex packages was agreed by the packaging commitee, it is in the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28TeX.29 but it was also said that not having tex- was not a big deal so I would not considering it as a blocker, but I think that you should really take into account consistency with the remaining of the distribution and user expectations. For the sponsoring, could you please point me to other works you've done in fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review