[Bug 446159] Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xesam-tools - A toolkit for Xesam compliant services


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446159


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2008-06-27 12:22 EST -------
I'm going to assume that the tests here are similarly not runnable.  I couldn't
get them to run, at least.

The upstream web site seems to be down now, but I think a more specific URL
would be good if possible.

The only thing I'm not sure about is the license.  The code doesn't have the
expected license blocks, but PKG-INFO and setup.py both say "GNU LGPL 2.1" so I
would have to assume LGPLv2 and not LGPLv2+ as you have.  This should definitely
be clarified with upstream, and "License: LGPLv2" used in the interim.

Honestly that's the only thing I see that requires fixing, so you can just
change it when you check in.

* source files match upstream:
  fcaea2c7dc21ede48feed9d743560e97db4c9fceb534a808a618b3f1791a5e93  
   xesam-tools-0.6.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
 license text not included upstream.
 license text included in package.
 latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   xesam-tools = 0.6.1-1.fc10
  =
   /usr/bin/python
   python(abi) = 2.5

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED, just fix up the License.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]