Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mairix - A program for indexing and searching email messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436147 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-25 23:12 EST ------- I'm not really sure why this has been sitting around for so long; it's a small package, it builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to complain about. I can't really test it because all of my mail is locked away in a cyrus server, but I can review the packaging. Everything looks fine to me. * source files match upstream: e1d28459531ce30ce8dd41215cb0e6351ea81767cf4bbf1e8dbd22618f4de1d7 mairix-0.21.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mairix = 0.21-1.fc10 = libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I do not have the means to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review