Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 ------- Additional Comments From andrea.francia@xxxxxx 2008-06-25 14:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > The right level > of non-genericity is something subjective, my feeling is that > trash is not right since it may clash easily with an application doing something > very different, and be used in a standard in the future, be > is a defacto standard like what is in some basic package like util-linux, > coreutils, bash buil-in and a few others or a real standard. When a such standard will be created I can accommodate the trash-cli command names to do not conflict with the standard. The util-linux is standard only on Linux based distribution. Debian which is not Linux specific doesn't have the util-linux 'rename' which is a command with a interface so poorly designed that doesn't allows to grows (for example you cannot add any switches to rename synopsys without broking the existing interface). At the present 'trash' is the best (in terms of usability) name I've found for the command that trashes files. It's important for me provide a usable interface to facilities of trash-cli package. If someone could suggest me a name that is good in terms of usability and is not so generic please tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review