Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 ------- Additional Comments From dcnltc@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-23 19:48 EST ------- > > > package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > > > package builds in mock: > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=664952&name=build.log I think the problem in the build was because configure didn't really work. What kind OS was on your test machine? I think the crux of the problem is in the output from configure: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU = powerpc64, OS = linux-gnu, Vendor = redhat, HostType = powerpc64 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ERROR: Platform powerpc64 not yet supported On the fedora9 ppc machine I tried I got: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU = powerpc64, OS = linux-gnu, Vendor = redhat, HostType = powerpc -------------------------------------------------------------------------- So, it is HostType=powerpc vs HostType=powerpc64. On my machine I don't get this configuration error. What does config.guess return on your machine? On my Fedora9 ppc machine I get: powerpc64-redhat-linux-gnu which is the same thing I see in a RHEL5.2 ppc machine. If you think that the configure script should be able to handle the HostType=powerpc64, I can go ahead and patch the configure.in. > > > package installs properly. (couldn't check) > > > debuginfo package looks complete. (couldn't check) > > > final provides and requires are sane (couldn't check) > > > if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run What does this mean by "couldn't check"? I was unable to do hardly any testing on the fedora9 machine because I couldn't find compatible pieces like binutils-devel since my machine is in ABAT. I spent about a week some time ago trying to get Fedora9-alpha installed from CDs on a ppc machine but never could get it to work. > > That, and the naming. See below. > What is the naming issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review