Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: player - Cross-platform robot device interface and server Alias: player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448025 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2008-06-23 16:32 EST ------- no 64 build here. I have it building under f9 32bit. The project itself is actually named player so then binaries of the form /usr/bin/player* aren't in shorthand. Is it appropriate to rename binaries when the actual project name is too generic? And what exactly do you do to make them less generic? its one thing to make a binary be more specific to match the project name.. requiring mplayer's binary to say mplayer instead of player. But when the project name is too generic what exactly do you do? Do you append player- to all the binaries so we have executables like player-player and player-playernav ? -jef -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review