Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Locale - Localization support for DateTime.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452455 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dev@xxxxxxxxxx) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2008-06-23 01:36 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=675976 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 04cd7e65e4c773dfce972699aafc1f64 DateTime-Locale-0.4001.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test is ok. All tests successful, 2 tests and 1 subtest skipped. Files=10, Tests=9379, 4 wallclock secs ( 3.87 cusr + 0.13 csys = 4.00 CPU) Except license everything else look ok to me. my question is can we see if CLDR license can be approved license and can we specify it in License tag also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review