Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 ------- Additional Comments From dennis@xxxxxxxx 2008-06-13 00:22 EST ------- [dennis@bratac ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-x86_64/result/*rpm liblicense.src:92: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:95: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:98: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:99: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:100: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:103: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:104: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:105: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:106: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense.src:107: E: files-attr-not-set liblicense-cli.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-cli.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/license ['/usr/lib64'] liblicense-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-modules.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation liblicense-python.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/liblicense/liblicense.so ['/usr/lib64'] 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 4 warnings. I had intended to sponsor Asheesh. it builds fine in mock but we have a few things to fix still -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review