Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 ------- Additional Comments From fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-09 17:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm wondering if it wouldn't just be simpler to call the package libgpp4 and > save yourself the trouble. As it is, get things like this nice long > %description which doesn't actually make it into any of the packages. > I agree - I'll try to get this change made upstream, along with the others I've gathered here. > Plenty of rpmlint spew worth looking at: > > W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libgpp4-devel-1.0.4/doc/latex/csym_f_page.tex > doxygen creates this; I'm not sure if it's worth converting or if it even matters. > Not sure what the best course of action is here - could just have doxygen spit out the html docs... > There are several complaints about the contents of the "test" directory being > packaged as documentation, which I think is particularly ill-advised. Why > aren't the tests just called at build time in a %check section? > For now I've removed the test directory from the -devel package, and I'll make some suggestions upstream to move the test folder to TESTS in automake. updated spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4.spec updated srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4-1.0.4-8.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review