[Bug 449317] Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gamazons - GNOME Amazons


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449317


fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-06-07 20:36 EST -------
Review for
ead55a82f610dc729519bfc5de1abab0  gamazons-0.83-1.fc9.src.rpm

OK - MUST: rpmlint silent on all packages
OK - MUST: package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package name
OK - MUST: meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: licensed GPLv2 and meets the Licensing Guidelines 
OK - MUST: license field in the package spec file matches actual license
OK - MUST: source package includes the text of the license and it is correctly
included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec written in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by md5 33c2b373fd7fff25282eae56d5926a7a
OK - MUST: package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386
OK - MUST: no known ExcludeArchs
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
OK - MUST: spec file handles locales properly with %find_lang
OK - MUST: package is not relocatable
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, correct %defattr
OK - MUST: package has a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK - MUST: macro usage consistent
OK - MUST: package contains code, no content
OK - MUST: no large docs for a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application
OK - MUST: no header files for a -devel package
OK - MUST: no static libraries for a -static package
OK - MUST: package does not contain any .la libtool archives
OK - MUST: GUI application includes a %{name}.desktop file, that is properly
installed with desktop-file-install
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages
OK - MUST: 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' at the beginning of %install
OK - MUST: all filenames are valid UTF-8

OK - SHOULD: package builds in mock with fedora-9-i386.cfg. With
fedora-devel-i386.cfg avahi is broken ATM but this is not an issue here
OK - SHOULD: latest stable version
OK - SHOULD: functions as described

FIX - MINOR: Please include src/thots in %doc since it contains the usual TODO
list. 
FIX - MINOR: Please include src/gamazon.bugs in %doc
?? - MINOR: You can remove the requirement for yelp, see bug # 243390 comment #
2 for example

I can't find no blockers, so this package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]