Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 jroth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jroth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-06 08:02 EST ------- > I can't understand that. If we use the 64bit elfspe to run an SPU program, it > will be executed in 64bit mode. Only the 64bit elfspe will run in 64bit. The SPE application will always run in 32bit. So I suggest to use one of the two following possibilities for elfspe: 1. Build a ppc and a ppc64 package of elfspe. - the problem here would be that if one installs both packages on one system the elfspe binary will be overwritten. 2. Build the ppc64 package only. - Binaries in Fedora should be 64bit on a 64bit architecture. The libspe2-adabinding-devel package contains only include files for developing ada based SPE applications. Therefore I'd say that we should use either build a ppc or a ppc64 package only. As libgnat is available for ppc only it might make sense to build the libspe2-adabinding-devel package for ppc as well. Are there any opinions, suggestions? What is the correct way of handling this in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review