Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblinebreak - A Unicode line-breaking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450054 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-06 00:25 EST ------- I note that the debuginfo package comes out empty; it seems that you can't generate useful debuginfo for static libraries, so you should probably just disable the debuginfo generation. If you're providing static libraries and no dynamic libraries are present, the statics can live in the -devel package but you need to provide -static so that packages can BuildRequire: it. Finally, I have vague unease about this package putting everything in the main package and having that provide the extra symbols. I think libassuan is in pretty much the same situation, with no non-devel files; it just produces a libassuan-devel package, and provides -static, with no main package. (It also has only a static library, and disables the -debuginfo package.) I'm not saying that what you're doing is wrong; it just looks odd to me. If you have an example of another package which does the same thing then let me know so I can look at the review discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review