Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 ------- Additional Comments From stenzel@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-05 15:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > I'll investigate that together with Dirk. Thanks. > > I talked with Gerhard about this before. He said: > > elfspe: There is no benefit seen in having a 64 bit elfspe binary. But I think > that Fedora has ppc64 repository, so we should have 64 bit elfspe. As long there is the understanding that only one elfspe binary, either 32bit or 64bit, can be installed, I don't think there is a real issue. > libspe-adabinding: Because ppu-gnat creates 64bit binaries. It seems to be an > IBM Cell SDK specific reason. My understanding is, that the ADA compiler can produce either 32bit or 64bit binaries depending on how the ADA compiler itself was built. >From that perspective, choosing the 64bit seems the better choice. But I don't have neither a strong opinion nor a strong background in this area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review