[Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507





------- Additional Comments From stenzel@xxxxxxxxxx  2008-06-05 15:07 EST -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > I'll investigate that together with Dirk. Thanks.
> 
> I talked with Gerhard about this before. He said:
> 
> elfspe: There is no benefit seen in having a 64 bit elfspe binary. But I think
> that Fedora has ppc64 repository, so we should have 64 bit elfspe.

As long there is the understanding that only one elfspe binary, either 32bit or
64bit, can be installed, I don't think there is a real issue.

> libspe-adabinding: Because ppu-gnat creates 64bit binaries. It seems to be an
> IBM Cell SDK specific reason.

My understanding is, that the ADA compiler can produce either 32bit or 64bit
binaries depending on how the ADA compiler itself was built.
>From that perspective, choosing the 64bit seems the better choice. But I don't
have neither a strong opinion nor a strong background in this area.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]