[Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458





------- Additional Comments From stu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-06-04 15:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> CC'ing Stu, who seems to be the current maintainer of this package.

Thanks!

> From the README file I'd expect to see silc and silcd binaries somewhere, and
> something other than libsilc packages to hold them, but the source doesn't seem
> to include any actual applications.  I guess if it grew some then the base
> package would be misnamed but we don't usually worry about naming issues in
> merge reviews unless there are egregious issues.

This is due to the slightly odd way upstream creates 3 separate packages
(silc-client, silc-server and silc-toolkit/libsilc) from the same source tree.
Would you prefer me to patch the README to exclude mention of the client and
server, just drop the README, or do nothing?

I assume for fixes to the other issues I should just commit them to CVS?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]