Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 ------- Additional Comments From stu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-06-04 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > CC'ing Stu, who seems to be the current maintainer of this package. Thanks! > From the README file I'd expect to see silc and silcd binaries somewhere, and > something other than libsilc packages to hold them, but the source doesn't seem > to include any actual applications. I guess if it grew some then the base > package would be misnamed but we don't usually worry about naming issues in > merge reviews unless there are egregious issues. This is due to the slightly odd way upstream creates 3 separate packages (silc-client, silc-server and silc-toolkit/libsilc) from the same source tree. Would you prefer me to patch the README to exclude mention of the client and server, just drop the README, or do nothing? I assume for fixes to the other issues I should just commit them to CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review