[Bug 226115] Merge Review: m4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: m4


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226115





------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx  2008-06-01 11:30 EST -------
MUST Items: 

xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM
    + [rishi@ginger x86_64]$ rpmlint m4-1.4.11-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm
      m4.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/m4-1.4.11/COPYING
      [rishi@ginger x86_64]$ 

OK - follows Naming Guidelines
OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec

xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines
    + According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make you should use
'make %{?_smp_mflags}' whenever possible. In this case since upstream supports
parallel builds (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=639507) you
should use it.
    + To preserve timestamps you could consider using:
      make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT

OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines
OK - License field meets actual license
OK - upstream license file included in %doc
OK - spec file uses American English
OK - spec file is legible
OK - sources match upstream sources
OK - package builds successfully
OK - ExcludeArch not needed
OK - build dependencies correctly listed
OK - no locales
OK - no shared libraries
OK - package is not relocatable
OK - file and directory ownership
OK - no duplicates in %file

xx - file permissions set properly
    + The COPYING file's permissions need to be set to 644. You could do that in
%prep.
    + The preferred attribute definition is: %defattr(-,root,root,-)

OK - %clean present
OK - macros used consistently
OK - contains code and permissable content
OK - -doc is not needed
OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime
OK - no header files
OK - no static libraries
OK - no pkgconfig files
OK - no library files
OK - -devel is not needed
OK - no libtool archives
OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed
OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages
OK - buildroot correctly prepped
OK - all file names valid UTF-8

SHOULD Items:

OK - upstream provides license text
xx - no translations for description and summary
OK - package builds in mock successfully
OK - package builds on all supported architectures
OK - package functions as expected
OK - scriptlets are sane
OK - subpackages are not needed
OK - no pkgconfig files
OK - no file dependencies outside /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]