[Bug 448310] Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: elice - Elice is a PureBasic to c++ translator / compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448310





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx  2008-05-31 15:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> - Summary: A partial PureBasic to C++ cross-compiler
> ? Generation commands should use svn export instead

I don't use svn that often, but indeed export is much better in this case

> - The ruby BR is covered by ruby-racc

Only implicit not (through /usr/bin/ruby and ruby(abi) = 1.8) not explicit and
the ruby guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby
say:
"Ruby packages must require ruby at build time with a BuildRequires: ruby"

> ? "C++" case in %description

Fixed

> ? "make: bzr: Command not found" - not a blocker, but it is ugly (I thought it
> was pulled from svn...)

I know, I guess the elice author uses bzr for its own internal version tracker
and then from time to time submits his work to Lost Labyrinths svn. Nothing I
can do here really.

> - I don't like that the lostlaby patches are in here instead of the
> lostlabyrinth SRPM

Oh, those are no longer needed, they have been integrated into Lost Labyrinth
2.9.2 -> dropped.

> . Noted that 2 lostlabyrinth-specific executables are included

Yip, as said in the description, this really is only meant for building Lost
Labyrinth

> ??? HOLY CRAP! Is that really all the font data from Vera.ttf included in the
> script?!

Erm, yes it would seem so, I will contact upstream about this asking them to
just use a file instead.

> ? No license reference in many of the source files

The licensing for all relevant files (including a file list) is explained in the
file titled COPYING (no this is not just a copy of the GPL).

> ? Tests aren't run in %check

Good catch! Fixed.

Here is a new version with most issues fixed:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/elice.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/elice-0.0-0.2.svn257.fc9.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]