Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-30 17:40 EST ------- I can confirm that /usr/lib/debug is making it into the package, but not on x86_64 where I usually build. I did an i386 build and everything under /usr/lib/debug is indeed included in the main package. I note that recent rpmlint has grown a complaint about the Summary not being capitalized. Might be good to fix that. I am not at all comfortable approving this package with the FHS violations in /var/spool, and the naming issue troubles me as well. You can say that it's really "hylafax" and not "hylafax+", but the bottom line is that the upstream web site very clearly puts the '+' there and makes the distinction between the plussed and unplussed versions clear. Also, when I go to google and enter "hylafax" I get pointed to hylafax.org which uses no '+' anywhere and gets me a different piece of software. Honestly, Fedora has no interest in any argument between the upstream developers of the different branches of hylafax, and if you can't work out a consistent naming scheme amongst yourselves which you present to us then I'm quite happy to say that we'll just wait it out. I'm going to start a thread on fedora-devel to try and get some discussion going. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review