Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Event-Lib - Perl wrapper around libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446411 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2008-05-27 07:40 EST ------- oops sorry I missed this review from my review list. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=630225 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 90b60028f7f5836072e95c6d5b1d069e Event-Lib-1.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test output is All tests successful. Files=36, Tests=4280, 56 wallclock secs ( 8.13 cusr + 1.05 csys = 9.18 CPU) + Package perl-Event-Lib-1.03-2.fc10 => Provides: Lib.so perl(Event::Lib) = 1.03 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libevent-1.3e.so.1 perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review