Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-24 19:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #83) > Whether or not the package should be called "hylafax" or "hylafax+"... I really > don't care much. My preference is to leave it as "hylafax" since users who are > using old "hylafax" RPMs from hylafax.org should be able to seamlessly upgrade > with 'rpm -Uvh' without noticing much beyond the usual. We could easily archive this with a Provides: hylafax. > As for the stuff going in under /var/spool... I'm afraid that's something that I > cannot change. ... One point: I'm pretty sure we will get in trouble with SELinux that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review