Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minirpc - an RPC library for stream oriented transports https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447533 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-05-21 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I could do this, but it doesn't seem to matter with multilib. Plus, one of the > headers is a generated file anyway, so the timestamps don't mean much. Is there > a reason for doing this? For the file which is not generated the timestamp is an interesting information in any case. For the generated file, it does matter if you install both arch and do a rpm -V. there is also some simple related hints on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks But since the doxygen files are generated too, I won't make it a blocker. The timestamps could be kept with (untested): touch -c -r minirpc/minirpc.h.in minirpc/minirpc.h touch -r CHANGES doc/html/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review